Garden State Essay -- essays research papers

tend State by PipsorcleAndrew Largemans (Zack Braff) journey throughout "Garden State" seems to be a testament on the convey of liberation. Going from his struggling acting life in Los Angeles to his hometown in revolutionary Jersey, where he witnesses his mothers funeral, Andrew is in the mist of confronting difficult issues. One of the biggest issues is coming to footing with his psychologist father (Ian Holm), whom he has distanced himself from for many years because he has put him on powerful antidepressants for most of his life. The reason for this I will non emit further it has caused Andrew to feel as if his father has controlled his life in a way.In showing how Andrew Largeman finds himself again, "Garden State" makes a good woof in putting him in every one of its scenes. Since this film is genuinely almost Largeman, because he is in every scene, we see a overture in his character as time goes on. At the beginning, we sense that Andrew feels rath er numb and alienated plainly then as the film progresses, he becomes more energetic and liberated. This gradual change in his character is highlighted all the way in the cinematography, a key method in showing Andrews mental state.For a directorial debut, I must say Zack Braff has given me a whole different impression than from his regular role in the "Scrubs" TV series. One might think that for a directorial debut coming from a TV actor would be uneven and at outgo, formulaic and uninspired. Thats not the case here with "Garden State." Braff shows he knows how to handle directing and layertelling soon enough at the same time, showing a vision that clearly establishes himself as an auteur. Examples of this are the tense moments when Andrew is around his father. A lesser film would go for theatrics and end up being very talky in dialogue, but instead, Andrew and his fathers moments together are more subtle. Whenever we see both of them together, they talk but when they talk, their relationship is forced. Theres a sense of silence at times, which shows they feel disquieting seeing distributively other after the lack of good discourse for about a decade.Of course, one might think that from the way Im describing "Garden State" so far, the film is on the more serious side. Its actually more funny than serious but even describing the film as a comedy wouldnt do ju... ... selling his invention of soundless secure and now trundles down the corridors of his unfurnished McMansion in a golf cart. other buddy, Mark (Peter Sarsgaard), sells jewelry he acquires in a highly uncommon manner. Braff also writes simple in so far refreshing dialogue, with plenty of offbeat humor, yet none of it is strained, nothing is played self-consciously for laughs. Braff himself has a warm, easy-to-watch screen presence. He can say nothing during the lull in a conversation, eyepatch the camera remains focused on his face, and it feels right. Portman a nd Sarsgaard are also genuine, each wonderfully relaxed in their roles. Production design is superb details in every scene are arranged well, and the photography, by Lawrence Sher, is - like the story and the acting unpretentious, never distracting, tricky or cute. This film never seems to manage us instead it engages us, arouses our curiosity and amusement, bids us gently to care about Andrew and Sam and even Mark, leaving us entertained in the best sense. This movie is as confident, as secure in itself, as comforting, as a well worn pair of house slippers or your preferent reading chair. A splendid film. Grade A- (09/04)