Members of Congress Should Have Term Limits Essay -- congressional ter

When the United States was founded, the discipline behind the new government was to establish an efficient system with turn up doling out too much power to any one mortal. The Founders intended to rule out a rebirth of one-man rule, which they had just escaped by breaking outside from England. However, when members of Congress such as Tom Foley, who served as a lesson from 1964 through 1995, and Jack Brooks, who served as a Representative from 1952 through 1994, carry on in the legislative system for over forty years, it is evident that tyranny has not necessarily been eradicated from the United States (Vance, 1994, p. 429). Term bournes are a requisite to uphold the Founders intentions, to prevent unfair advantages given to incumbents, and to allow a flock of additional benefits.Initially, the Founders intended to have a limit on the do of time any one person could serve. In the Articles of Confederation, a rotary motion in office system was described, so that no one person could remain in a position for decades on end. However, this was abandoned in the Constitution because it was deemed unnecessary. At the time of the nations founding, the occupation of politico did not exist. One could hold an office for a number of years, nevertheless it was not considered a career path. Originally, politicians were seen as making great sacrifices, because they stepped out-of-door from their family and primary jobs for a number of years to serve their country, before returning to their normal lives (Vance, 1994, p. 429). In the words of Founding Father Roger Sherman, The representatives ought to return inhabitation and mix with the people. By remaining at the seat of the government, they will aim the habits of the place, which might differ from those... ... crack due to career politicians disregarding the governmental system created by the Founders.Works CitedCRS Rep., 104th Cong., 1-2 (1997).CRS Rep., 106th Cong., 3-5 (2000).Kurfirst, R. (199 6). Term-limit logic paradigms and paradoxes. Polity, 29.1, 119-140.Madison, J. (1788, Feb. 19). The Federalist no. 57 The aver tendency of the new plan to elevate the few at the get down of the many considered in connection with representation. New York Packet. Retrieved from http//constitution.org/fed/federa57.htmU.S. Const., art. I, 2.Vance, D.A. (1994). State-imposed congressional line limits what would the Founders of the Constitution say?. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1994, 429.Weissert, C., & Halperin, K. (2007). The paradox of term limit support to know them is not to love them. Political Research Quarterly, 60.3, 516-517.